📋 Cybersecurity Relevance
Joint Standard 1 IT governance requirements place importance on effective IT risk management, oversight, asset protection, access controls, resilience and incident reporting. From a cybersecurity perspective, this makes external risk visibility, secure digital services, email domain trust and governance-friendly evidence important parts of a financial institution’s IT risk management approach.
🧾 Overview
Name: Joint Standard 1 of 2023 – IT Governance and Risk Management for Financial Institutions
Act no: N/A
Effective Date: 15 November 2024
Type: Principle-based
Regulator: Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) and Prudential Authority (South African Reserve Bank)
Purpose: Establishes principles and minimum requirements for effective IT governance and risk management within financial institutions. Notes: Issued jointly by the FSCA and Prudential Authority under the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017
👥 Who Does This Affect?
Direct Applicability:
- a bank, a branch (commonly referred to as a ‘branch of a foreign institution’), a branch of a bank or a bank controlling company defined in section 1 of the Banks Act, 1990 (Act No. 94 of 1990);
- a mutual bank as defined in section 1 of the Mutual Banks Act, 1993 (Act No. 24 of 1993);
- an insurer and a controlling company of an insurer as defined in section 1 of the Insurance Act, 2017 (Act No. 18 of 2017);
- a manager as defined in section 1 of the Collective Investment Scheme Control Act, 2002 (Act No. 45 of 2002);
- a market infrastructure as defined in section 1 of the Financial Markets Act 2012 (Act No. 19 of 2012);
- a discretionary FSP as defined in Chapter II of the Notice on Codes of Conduct for Administrative and Discretionary FSPs, 2003 [Explanatory note: (Category II)]; and
- an administrative FSP as defined in Chapter I of the Notice on Codes of Conduct for Administrative and Discretionary FSPs, 2003 [Explanatory note: (Category III)].
High Impact On:
Banks, Insurers, Investment Managers, Market Infrastructures, IT Service Providers for Financial Institutions.
📋 Key Requirements Relating to Cybersecurity
The key Joint Standard 1 IT governance requirements relate to the systems, controls and oversight financial institutions use to manage technology-related risk.
- IT Risk Framework: Institutions must establish, implement, and regularly review a comprehensive IT risk management framework [Clause 7].
- Asset Protection: IT assets must be identified, prioritised, and safeguarded from unauthorised access or misuse [Clause 7.3(e)].
- Threat & Vulnerability Analysis: Institutions must assess the likelihood and impact of IT threats and establish mitigation controls [Clause 7.3(f)].
- Access Controls: Logical access to sensitive systems and data must be tightly controlled, enforced, and monitored [Clause 10.2(a)].
- Incident Notification: Material IT incidents must be reported to the responsible authority within the defined timeframe [Clause 15.1].
- Business Continuity & Resilience: Institutions must define recovery priorities and maintain tested IT resilience plans [Clause 13.1].
- Confidentiality Protections: Sensitive or personal data must be processed per POPIA and safeguarded against loss or theft [Clause 10.2(e)].
- Online Services Risk: Financial institutions must evaluate and mitigate IT risks specific to internet-facing services [Clause 11.1].
⚠️ Consequences of Non-Compliance
Financial Penalties:
Administrative penalties imposed for contraventions of joint standards [Section 267 – Financial Sector Regulation Act].
Criminal Penalties:
N/A
Regulatory Consequences:
Potential licence revocation, directives, or other enforcement actions [Section 144 – Financial Sector Regulation Act].
Other Regulatory Actions:
Specific information or assurance may be requested by FSCA or Prudential Authority [Clause 15.2]
Reputational Harm:
The loss of trust and damage to reputation can have long-term consequences for an FSP, including decreased customer loyalty, reduced business opportunities, and potentially higher costs associated with rebuilding trust.
✅ How ARMD.digital Supports Cybersecurity Compliance Efforts
Product:
What it does:
Provides a safe, non-invasive external vulnerability scan of your public digital footprint, highlighting security weaknesses that may be visible to attackers.
How it supports compliance:
- Threat & Vulnerability Analysis: Identifies current and emerging threats in external systems [Clause 7.3(f)]
- Online Services Risk: Assesses risks and security gaps in systems offering online financial services [Clause 11.1]
Product:
What it does:
Supports DMARC implementation and monitoring to help reduce domain spoofing risk, improve outbound email trust, and move safely towards enforcement.
How it supports compliance:
- Confidentiality Protections: Helps prevent data leaks and phishing attacks via email spoofing [Clause 10.2(e)]
- Access Controls: Aids in enforcing domain-level communication controls [Clause 10.2(a)]
📚 Additional Resources
- South African Reserve Bank (PA): Prudential Authority Publications
- Michalsons: Joint Standard Summary
(Links verified and active as of May 2025)
Where appropriate, we link to Michalsons’ expertly maintained legal resources and plain-language explanations. We gratefully acknowledge their role in making South African legislation more accessible and understandable.